Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Review of 'Breach'

At home Robert Hanssen lived a double life. He was a suburban father of six and strict Catholic member of Opus Dei, but also a man who secretly filmed his own sex-life and had a bizarre long-term relationship with a stripper. This duplicity extended to his work life: he was a well-respected FBI employee with 25 years service, but sold secrets to the Russians for most of that time. The information he sold – for US$1.4 million in cash and diamonds - became known as the worst breach of American intelligence in history and was responsible for the deaths of at least two people. It is Hanssen’s story that forms the basis of the film Breach.

With so much already known about the real case, director Billy Ray decided to focus on the relationship between Hanssen and Eric O’Neill, the young agent who was secretly assigned to be Hanssen’s assistant and spy on him, hoping to expose his traitorous activities. Ray was fortunate enough to involve the real Eric O’Neill to help create a tense story of two men and the extent to which they trust can and should trust each other.

Chris Cooper is brilliant as the enigmatic and grumpy spy Hanssen, playing out the most dangerous game in the world in the last days of his career. Although he knows he shouldn’t trust O’Neill (Ryan Phillippe), the two men connect, partly through their faith, but mostly because of O’Neill’s decision to play it straight with Hanssen, disarming him with his naïve honesty and a genuine respect for the older man who he comes to admire. The screenplay is a long way from of the action-packed James Bond variety of espionage, but rather tackles the genre from the inside, building tension from the psychological stakes between the two men, and focusing on the small moments that could give away everything, even a life.

Ultimately though, the film doesn’t quite break its own restraints. It’s subtle and slow to get going, more mouse than cat in the game of spy versus spy. Director Ray carefully avoids making Hanssen a monster, but chooses not to explore some rich avenues of his character – his Catholicism and strange sexual behaviour, his bitterness and brilliance – all which may have added the complexity we needed to understand his motivations for a lifetime of deception, a question ultimately left unanswered. We leave with a sense of how the game is played, but not why.

No comments: